Saturday, December 3, 2011

What Does Being Anti-Abortion Mean?

In the scheme of life there are issues that we see thrown around in public and in places of worship, from podiums, sidewalks, and any place people are - there are issues that we must talk about and have a dialogue over even if we have an opposing opinion. To those of you who have no opinion, I wish to challenge you to decide if I am wrong. There is always the argument that everyone is entitled to their opinion. That is correct, but the saying should be, "Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but you can't have your own reality." That opinionated thinking allows for some people to ignore something I have come to know as independent origination. That means that whatever you create - any action, object, or cause there is an opposite action, object, or cause that is created at the same time. That means that if for everything there is one exact opposite then when it comes to good or evil, there are only two ways to slice that. I am a firm believer in the concept and beauty of life. I am going to define what I mean.

Life begins at 60? No, just in commercials for retirement villages. Let's ask ourselves our own definition and for the purposes of clarity and non-ambiguity, let's say that we use the dictionary as our defining reference. What does birth mean? Why does there have to be a different definition of birth and conception? There is a valid reason and I will explain. Life is something sacred and an independent cause for cherishing for each of us individually. That is something everyone will agree on.

What does birth mean in the dictionary?

From at < >

1. an act or instance of being born: the day of his birth.

2. the act or process of bearing or bringing forth offspring; childbirth; parturition: a difficult birth.

3. lineage; extraction; descent: of Grecian birth.

4. high or noble lineage: to be foolishly vain about one's birth.

5. natural heritage: a musician by birth.

And so clearly we have a good idea at which point we are considered "born". That life begins at birth is a constant in the universe. Even the people who talk about being "born again" do so so they can start a new life. Scientifically and Literally we aren't truly living until we are breathing independently and experiencing life. Life, which is defined as being an organic mass that is self perpetually dividing cells and creating itself through the experience of moving around in the environment.

Life; Again from at: < >

1. the condition that distinguishes organisms from inorganic objects and dead organisms, being manifested by growth through metabolism, reproduction, and the power of adaptation to environment through changes originating internally.

2. the sum of the distinguishing phenomena of organisms,especially metabolism, growth, reproduction, and adaptationto environment.

3. the animate existence or period of animate existence of an individual: to risk one's life; a short life and a merry one.

4. a corresponding state, existence, or principle of existence conceived of as belonging to the soul: eternal life.

5. the general or universal condition of human existence: Too bad, but life is like that.

Again we are faced with certain facts. Facts that make ignoring some things impossible. When we look at the fact that life is, as in the first definition "...the condition that distinguishes organisms from inorganic objects and dead organisms, being manifested by growth through metabolism, reproduction, and the power of adaptation to environment through changes originating internally."

And if that meant that when we are lying, 'brain dead' despite a soul or internal energy of a sentient being (which is present in objects that aren't considered living), without the abiliity to breathe, grow through metabolism, reproduction, and the power of adaptation to the environment through changes originating internally, but through the supposed "life support" machines in a hospital that can sustain the tissue of a dead body through animation so that it "appears" to be alive, then, we aren't really alive.

That would 
also mean that while being dependent of an umbilical chord that is our only chance of living in this world without the body of the host (mother) that there would be no sustaining, growth, or cell devision and there is NOT a chance of reproducing. In other words, we aren't yet alive at that point.

When someone says to me that they are pro-life, that means to me that they are pro-fetus. That is like saying that we should stop eating eggs since they are already created and were independently growing inside their mother. But we realize that those are NOT living chickens until they hatch. Today I wish to introduce the Pro-Fetus movement. I want everyone who calls themselves Pro-Life and anyone who describes them, writes about them, or even mentions them - to step up; and start calling the people who call themselves Pro-Life what they really are. Pro-Fetus. What does this mean? This means you are putting the responsibility for the Fetus ahead of the mother. And what does that mean?

My friend Denice has pointed out on several occasions (but it didn't sink in to me until recently) that some men in our government who really shouldn't have a decision in women's lives and what they should do with their own lives in the future, treat them as if they are worthless.

What do I mean by that? 

Let me explain to you through asking you this simple question:
"When a woman becomes pregnant what does she become?" Is she suddenly this worthless human being that has no right to decide her life, a cocoon that is nothing more than a vessel meant for males to procreate in and through? Does someone think she deserves less respect for her opinion and that she - through a lack of being able to control her own life at that point without altering her pregnancy is deserving of no opinion or voice on her own life because she is carrying an embryo that is NOT living yet? Please comment below.

Thursday, December 1, 2011

Anti Union Legislation is Anti-Humanistic Legislation

The unions support the working class humans. Anyone who votes against unions is therefore voting against intelligently organized human beings who want more for their families than what they had and want to work to provide that for them. Every time the owner class corporate masters start seeing the working class enjoying themselves, they have to step on that. NOW, they finally did it. I knew when we threw this out of the legislatures on a state level when Scott Walker tried to do this state by state there was going to be a fight, so they now found a foothold in the U.S. Congress. They are suppressing state election results from the popular vote by creating this aristocratic corporation favored unfairness that will eventually lead to the destruction of the working class family.

Back in 2001, when I predicted things like this were happening and going to change the face of the working class in the U.S., people scoffed and said it could never happen here. We also were lulled into believing no one else would attack us on our soil ever again until that year. When the Bush-ites said 9-11 changed the game plan globally, no one realized they meant this. They quit thinking of the United States as their safe haven once they realized they could partner with foreign nations that could take control with a couple planes and a well planned execution.

This movement to return us to yesteryear's wages is an old song. Here is the problem. When slavery was legal, all the slave owners had to give them was enough shelter, food, medicinal care, and clothing to keep them healthy enough to work. If you can hardly afford that now, what is the difference?

This is the Republican Jobs Plan. To create another third world country where people have to beg for government handouts to keep their families fed. Everyone will work for slave wages and OWE THEM like in Pakistan where people are sold into indentured servitude at birth through a family owed debt.

It is like what happened to the people of India under the British. In Pakistan, there are children, born into indenture-ship, working at four years old until they die. When I heard Newt Gingrich talking about firing "unionized janitors" and replacing them with the nine year old children of the poor it was then I realized where we were headed. We are being conquered from within. This is the kind of Imperialist government action that has causes revolutions in other countries. The elite are taking over and something will eventually snap back or else we are going to be living in poverty as a nation. The part I don't get is how the working class poor, trailer park or tenement slum dwellers can vote for people like this and not realize they are screwing themselves.

I have one question for everyone that deserves a reaction: Did you ever think that you would live to see this happening in America?

If you want to see how your own local politicians voted for this per state, the list is at

I noticed that Ron Paul abstained from voting during this election campaigning when his supporters would probably have like to see him vote against this, as a supposed champion of individual rights and freedoms, but so as not to piss his Republican friends off, he hid out.

Oh, and while we are at it, these are 5 worker's rights that the unions created that the elite have shown that they don't want us to have any more by voting against unionization:

Saturday, November 26, 2011

The American Dream 99 % Movement

The Phoenix branch of the Occupy Wall Street Movement picture that is posted on another website. The guy in the hard hat is ME, the Arizona Mildman.

Thursday, November 24, 2011

Tuesday, November 22, 2011

People Who Define Everything They Don't Agree With As Liberal

Anyone who defines everything they hear that they don't want to believe as liberal or socialist is a common phenomena in the United States. There wouldn't be a problem with our economy right now if everyone who stood up for the G.O.P. greedy rich who took over religion, politics, and legislation in our country weren't supported by the ill informed. We all know someone like that. They are so brainwashed that when faced with evidence that completely debunks their point of view, they fight harder to believe it, rather than accept that they might have been wrong. In order to do this they are in what I call "a state of delusion". Some people call this denial but denial is when you look at a problem and consider it a problem but you look away. This is what you call the average person who wants to hang onto an incorrect theory rather than face the fact that it is wrong.
Then you have the true believer in a wrong theory. They CAN'T admit they might be wrong because they define themselves by a specific point of view. Their whole being makes them Troll the online bulletin boards and chat rooms on the internet in order to find SOMEONE to tell that they are correct in  the face of all evidence that their theories are incorrect but they hang on to any argument that has been proven to be incorrect a if their life depended on it because they are so highly insecure that they have no other way to reinforce in themselves their beliefs. When one of them is proven wrong with mountains of evidence, they try to discredit the evidence by calling it "LIBERAL" or merely say, "I am sure that is wrong..." but NEVER  have evidence to prove their point.
They are part of a movement. They believe if they keep saying something that is wrong long enough it will somehow become true or at least some people will believe it. The danger in this is that some who aren't that intelligent will believe it. When legions of the ill informed in this country are given a survey on what is correct or not, this is the kind of things that happen.
The Pew Research Institute Study on Religious Knowledge  ,
The Public Mind Poll from Farleigh Dickinson University  ,
And armed with the information that they are completely misinformed, this is their course of action:

  1. Argue harder that they are sure you are wrong;
  2. Make up talking points that don't make sense just to say something other than admit they were wrong;
  3. Try to discredit your source of information  although they themselves don't have a source of information that explains or details their point.

My only question is, "When are we going to start testing people on their knowledge before they are allowed to vote or run for office based on tests devised to correctly assess one's ability to make a rational decision that isn't based on opinion?" Because, in lieu of that, we are going to hard pressed to come up with a manner of living in society without constant conflict and the most devious (because they are wrong they don't see themselves as such) of our society using lies and deceit to control our media, political process, and monetary system. You decide. Please scroll down to the bottom of this page and answer the questions in the poll below.

Sunday, November 20, 2011

What I Have Learned From Republicans

  1. Anyone who starts a speech with the words, "My Friends, ..." is probably not your friend. ( Henry David Thoreau quote: " ...If you see a man approaching with the obvious intent 
    of doing you good, run for your life. "
  2. Invent religious messages that aren't in any spiritual book to hide behind while doing the opposite of anything any religion ever taught. (You will also need to make it appear you are a member of that same religion in order for it to look like you might know something about religion and social ethics.)
  3. When you have a certain level of income taxes coming in to bolster the prudent reserve, reduce the national debt, and support government spending that is working successfully, then the proper action is to decrease incoming capital (income taxes) and increase spending (trillion dollar military expenses) and tell anyone stupid enough to listen that something is going to trickle down, someday and when confronted on how 2 minus 2 doesn't equal five, blame it on everyone else.
  4. Make sure your friends who own big businesses are served by government first and make everyone else pay for it.
  5. Friends are people who send campaign contributions. The people whose labor and earnings support your friends don't have an opinion that matters.
  6. Talking points and emotional pleas are more important to think about than real issues that effect everyone daily.
  7. Don't ever have fear that a violent revolution is coming since you  know people are sheep and will follow since this is a nation who isn't desperate yet.
  8. Whenever you hear someone threatening to tell the truth about you being a fascist, attack them in the news with slander, propaganda, and fear campaigns that discredit them while calling them godless socialists.

Friday, November 18, 2011

Occupy Wall Street Protesters Arrested


The Occupy People who call themselves the 99% are making some noise which is focusing the conversation away from the distractions that are set up to make us forget who actually started and continues to perpetuate the financial crisis in America and they scare the hell out of the one percent. They had eight years of free reign under George Bush while GOP like John McCain and Jon Kyle deregulated any ethics legislation that kept unchecked war profiteering and while simultaneously creating huge government waste (into the pockets of the one percent who were profiting from the wars). The idea that free speech actually can come out of someone's mouth instead of through unlimited campaign donations is another part of the end of liberty and our freedoms for the sake of the corporate stooges in New York City. Mayor Bloomberg tops the list and the NYPD come second in the line of conspirators who want to help stop actual freedom of speech. 
The question is being repeatedly asked, "Hasn't this been long enough?" and my answer is, "NO, not until things change." They want the conversation to be redirected to distraction and subterfuge like it has been the majority of the time since just previous to the last election. They know that a grass roots movement focused on the real issues will cause them to have to quit being so greedy with the nation's wealth in the instance that people know the truth. They continue to control the news and try to manipulate the facts to discredit the Occupy Wall Street Movement. They call them hippies and lazy subculture whiners who are clueless. The truth is that is the furthest from the truth. They are hoping the hard hat real workers of today are going to come to their aid and get these riff raff off the street like they did during the Yippie days. 
But guess who showed up at Occupy Wall Street: 

The reality is that the 99 percent are actually The Culture, not a subculture. They are you and me. WE ARE THE NINETY NINE PERCENT and the demonstrators are standing up for us.
So to those of you who wonder when it will be long enough, here is my answer:

  1. When congress starts measuring their ability to govern by how well their constituents are doing and how well the general population is doing and how happy we all are, instead of how high a number of soft money contributions they receive. 
  2. When the Supreme Court admits that Freedom of Speech is something that has to do with speaking, not campaign contributions. When they acknowledge the unfairness they created while pitting corporations against "real" people.
  3. When anyone saying that there is an acceptable level of unemployment learns that there is no such thing.
  4. When the idea that minimum wage jobs simultaneous with maximum increases in the cost of living is acceptable goes away. 
  5. When the notion that Greed is Good stops being the mantra of our business community. (That thinking might have worked in the movies "Wall Street" and "Wall Street Never Sleeps at Night" for Gordon Gecko the fictional character, but it doesn't work in reality.)
  6. When Wall Street bankers and other special interests quit being able to buy our democracy and our right to representation.
  7. When political parties quit speaking for religions and religions quit acting as if they are the voice of political parties.
  8. When 99 percent of us actually see this country being the land of opportunity again as it was originally intended to be instead of it being an opportunity for the 99 percent of us to subsidize the 1 percent of us. 
  9. When the Bush tax cuts for the rich (that were intended to be a "Temporary Incentive" to create jobs) are rescinded and the wealthiest Americans start paying their fair share of income tax.
  10. When we see the jobs that the one percent were given tax breaks to create return to the land they were supposed to be created in and quit being a manner of paying slave wages while calling that the "global economy" instead of what it is, UNLIMITED GREED.
  11. When we can see in writing from congress that these measures aren't going to be temporary and politicians quit using the police to bully people who speak out against corruption.
  12. When the good of the people means the majority of us, not a few.


Saturday, November 12, 2011

Arizona Elections (supposedly) Full of Tainted Contribution Moneys

The thought always occurs to me to wonder, "When is the state of Arizona going to wake up and stop electing the same carpetbagger type crooks who have already become rich campaigning as politicians and receiving illegal campaign contributions?" This is a good example of why the Supreme Court Ruling was sought by the lobbyists that make a profit from leveraging our legislation that should be for the people to be bought and paid for by the so called "special interests", A.K.A. "Corrupt Businesses" that want to control the legal system so that they can fleece the public. Everything here in Arizona from the corporation commission to the department of financial systems is so easily manipulated by the large corporate types that control the state. Years ago the Phoenix 40 ran the city council with their "qualified requests" to everyone from the Chamber of Commerce to the city councils to the Indian Reservation Tribal Councils through donations. Old time political masters still have a few tricks that were passed on to today's group of corrupt officials who still buy elections through what they call a form of "grass roots" senior citizen campaigning. They load several vans full of those who can't hardly remember their own name most of the time and drive them to the polls to vote. They feed them candy and ice cream, anything they want to eat that they can't get at the nursing home. While these seniors are in a euphoric sugar haze and in a good mood, the candidate's name is repeated to them over and over while reminding them what nice guy he is for giving them all a ride to the polls since they can't get out on their own. They have been doing this kind of influence on a state full of senior homes where so many people basically come here to retire or convalesce previous to dying since the state was run by the Northern and Southern Elite Families in Arizona, (Whose names I don't need to mention since most of their lineage have become the governors and mayors and other prominent positioned politicians in this state.) our own brand of Aristocracy. Formed in 1975, the "Phoenix 40" was an organization of influential Phoenix businessmen who professed to be working for the greater good of the community. They represented the top executives whose families, to this day, still run the media, finance and industry for this whole state.

From the Keaton Five Scandal to the Don Bolles Murder investigation, the slightest implication of wrong doing on the part of any of their families brings media, police, and legal bullying with a broad brush, like a bullet proof hazzardous materials sanitation crew, to fend off any complications before the real story is exposed to it's fullest degree. Then there is The Arizona Republican  which is mirrored online by .

I remember when three of our state's most prominent businessmen and our governor were implicated during the Bolles Murder Indictment Trials and the governor suddenly found an ambassadorship in a Central American country and disappeared like the wind. And whenever these same people's children go into the military, somehow on their return they become "war heroes" and immediately are accepted by the public here as such, because the people of Arizona seem to believe anything they see on television.

Recently Russell Pearce, the sponsor of the controversial law on illegal immigrants SB 1070, became the first state legislator in Arizona history to be removed from office via a recall election in November 2011. He is expected to officially leave office once the Arizona Secretary of State certifies the recall election results, which is anticipated November 21st. In my opinion, this is merely a good start and the rest need to go, SOON! I can't wait to see it happen.

Now, on top of all that, Phoenix just had a Mayoral race and there were two distinctly different candidates. One was Russell Gullett who is my odds on favorite to be the kind of politician that Arizona has a history of voting for, and in my opinion should never elect again. So instead of as per usual, the citizens of Phoenix elected a guy named Stanton. I am still shaking my head, although glad, despite a small scandal over TAINTED ELECTION CAMPAIGN MONEY reported by the Arizona Republic (in another biased review). Mayoral candidate Greg Stanton's former campaign treasurer will serve one year of supervised probation for stealing more than $77,000 from an account Stanton used to run for Phoenix City Council. There is more about this at:

And Phoenix New Times columnist Monica Alonzo reported a humorous piece on Greg Stanton, calling him the "Enemy of The People":

with a reference to the movie by the same name and picture of actor "Gene Hackman" making that famous quote, "...It's not paranoia if they're really after you."

There was actually a Republican News Letter that went out calling him "The candidate to beat" and this is why they listed as reasons:

- Endorsed by police union. (Boy, there is a real reason to hate this guy, huh?)
- Endorsed by LGBT special interest group. (I am sure this put him on the list for sure.)
- Proudly says he would have voted for the food tax. (So did most of the Republicans, they are the store owners here, but they threw this in anyway.This is a misrepresentation, see
- Waves away criminal charges when the perpetrator is connected enough.
- Protested SB1070 in the parking lot of the Heard Museum last year. (No comment.)
- Tagged by the DLC in 2003 as one of the country's 100 "Rising New Democrat Stars". (Oh My God! Commie!)

    Thursday, November 10, 2011

    John McCain's Thinks This Is Funny

    From the Reuters report about the comment of John McCain. He thinks more Yachts and Private Planes are more important than the hiring that these people needed to be doing since the Bush Tax cuts were created for the Jobs Creators. Rich spoiled billionaires and millionaires that John McCain defends as needing to be defended from the rest of us, the 99 percent of those needing jobs and an income in the United States. The Republicans in congress are the first to worry about taxes but they don't seem to understand that income tax comes from taxable incomes of the working class, not the pittance they get from the one percent who hide behind shelters and lobbying bought and paid for politicians in our congress.

    Citation: Source:

    Praise OHIO! Thank You!

    To protect everyone in the 99 percent the people of Ohio actually stepped out in the street and did what needed to be done around the country.
    Please watch the whole video to understand:

    Tuesday, November 1, 2011

    My Occupy Phoenix Experience

    Hi everyone, I was trying to video record this whole sequence which the speech made by the protester was really heartfelt and good but you will have to expand the description below it to understand what is going on because the traffic noise was so bad that you can hardly hear him. The whole protest kind of got killed by lousy organization on someone's part who posted the calendar of events. They told everyone to meet at Cesar Chavez PARK that I showed in that other video. Cesar Chavez PLAZA is where the actual protest was supposed to take place by City Hall. Most people probably did what I did, drove to the park (which is 8.5 miles away according to Google Maps) and looked around, didn't see anyone and went home.

    Anyway, here is the video at :

    Anyone planning to be in the area and wants to go there should go to 210 W. Washington and NOT TO 35th Avenue and West Baseline Road.

    Wednesday, October 26, 2011

    The Rick Perry Interview With Fox News on Income Inequality

    This post is in response to the interview on Fox News with Rick Perry that was published at

    I am sure I am not the only one who sees the holes in this plan. 

    Rick Perry announced on Tuesday that if elected president he would slash the corporate tax rate to 20 percent from 35 and give everyone the option of paying a flat income tax rate of 20 percent.

    The fifteen percent drop in the corporate tax rate would have to be balanced somewhere else and his plan for that is what? Once again, they would raise everyone else's taxes (You and me.). This is Rick Perry acting like he can completely ignore everything the "Occupy Wall Street" protest movement stands for. This is why people like him need to be removed from the equation. He, like most of Texas, wants to ignore the mood and condition of the rest of the United States. He actively admitted that he accepted Federal Grant Subsidies for Texas as if that had nothing to do with their rise in employment and in the same breath says that Obama's spending to increase employment never works. They received stimulus money that was directly earmarked for job creation which many other states that are far worse depressed, didn't. He acts like he doesn't understand where that money came from, using the excuse that since they send a lot of money to Washington, then it would be stupid to not get some back. He seems to think Texans are the only Americans to pay income taxes per the amount of revenue and income they create.
    He also would try to encourage U.S. companies who have stored $1.4 trillion overseas to move their profits back to the United States by allowing them to pay 5.25 percent in taxes at first, according to Reuters.

    He says that he would "TRY TO ENCOURAGE" (?) U.S. Companies who have moved overseas to move back (?)" which has been suggested before (since, who, Ronald Reagan or dating back to before FDR ?) . I would like to mention here that his party threw a fit over Obama doing peace conferences without prior previsions and agreements. They want stimulus to go to people who don't need the money with no guarantee that wealthy business owners would start hiring again unless it is FIRST in writing, like the negotiation the president did with GM, which they then criticized him for. Once again the carrot that tax breaks will encourage growth is waved in front of our noses but we all know that this is only a small part of the savings of using foreign labor and paying substandard wages in other countries. Anyone who looks at cities in India where American outsourcing is at it's greatest can see that there are still slums where people don't own a toilet but they are right next door to the nice housing where corporate workers live, who get paid more for being a telephone solicitor than being a computer programmer. NO ONE CARES about the living conditions of foreign workers. Some American IT Computer Programmers (mostly in Silicon Valley) were being payed up to 120 dollars and over an hour. 
    Those guys were supporting the housing industry, which supported the banking industry. People talk about predatory lending should read the prices for California real estate in the San Francisco area at that time. It is still obscene. 
    In India for example, they receive what we in the United States consider minimum wage. One day the American corporate efficiency experts fired them and rehired all of their employees through staffing agencies (while assuring them nothing would change) who took  one third of their salaries and paid no benefits.These people were living the American dream PLUS, two story houses on the beach in San Francisco with two or three Lexus payments for each of their families.  Now they had two thirds income and NO BENEFITS (including the exorbitant medical care in California). The employees sued the companies for BREACH OF CONTRACT then, when wired news on Lycos broke the story the companies moved to India where they could train people and pay them less than 7 percent of what they were paying employees here. These were mostly people who had Masters Degrees in Computer Science and at least 25 years of IT experience in the industry that THEY CREATED. 
    Now, profit wise, these companies didn't decrease revenue when their costs went through the floor, they started charging us more still, while taking an over 93 percent drop in payroll expenses (which is the biggest overhead expense for almost any business) with almost NO INCOME TAX if they keep an income base in a foreign country for over three years. So the 35 percent tax amount Perry mentions is fictitious if they stay overseas for over three years (which most of them have exceeded already).
    Even if that wasn't so, does he really think a 15 percent tax break is going to outweigh what they are saving in payroll expense and cause them to come home and pay American workers even twice what they pay there, much less a comparable 500 to 900 percent of what they pay in foreign wages? This is why at one time American workers (especially Union workers) were paying for commercials that said, "Look for the  union label" and "Made in America". It was because they knew this day would come eventually come. And on this shore, we have illegal aliens bringing down the standard wage while costs go up. And who suffers? The American middle class worker is left paying higher prices plus more taxes per his lessening income while paying more for items that cost less than ten percent of what it took to create them a decade ago.
    The plan, if enacted, would dramatically reduce the tax burdens of the wealthiest people in the United States,

    Which is basically ALL IT WILL DO and if that worked at creating jobs, like we were tricked into believing for a couple years, then the Bush Tax Cuts for the Rich would have worked ten to eleven years ago the way it was predicted.

    saving millions of dollars for some, while raising taxes for poor and middle-class people who opt into the plan (by electing him).

    Thursday, October 20, 2011

    Once Again, Rushing To Get It Wrong!

    Rush Limbaugh attacked President Obama for sending troops to Uganda. He originally said they were Christians then he said later that he was kidding. It didn't sound like he was kidding. Steven Colbert reported the original episode of Limbaugh's remarks.

    The Colbert ReportMon - Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c
    Rush Limbaugh's Christian Killing Accusations
    Colbert Report Full EpisodesPolitical Humor & Satire BlogVideo Archive

    The amount of Limbaugh's incorrect babbling over the years has been nothing short of propaganda and is so misinformed that he constantly sounds delusional to anyone who can read and has any social skills. He makes me wonder how he can expect people to believe anything he says. The following is a good case in point:

    I thought I would share with you some of the people on the internet over at Vimeo made a anime comment about the Lord's Resistance Army before Rush tried to clean up what he said. This is their take on the situation and the cause for his remarks:

    Dear Mr. Limbaugh: Evelyn's Appeal from Strongheart on Vimeo.

    And finally, here is the part that Rush Limbaugh doesn't read or watch or even want to know about. This message is from someone who didn't watch if from their easy chair in America.

    The Economy Poem By Steve Walker (the Arizona Mildman)

    The Economy Poem
    By Steve Walker (the Arizona Mildman)

    Republicans lying and acting like they're going through cranial trauma,
    All they know how to say is, "Blame it on Obama",
    Just because they know it rhymes with Osama, 
    You notice since he killed Bin Laden they quit all that drama,

    The lack of thinking they put into every lie and excuse,
    Makes you wonder if they really could have thought this all the way through,
    They don't know what to do other than insult and accuse, 
    The man was the president of the Harvard Law Review,

    Do they really think we are going to forget for a minute,
    The two thousand twelve presidential election they really want to win it, 
    They think they can't admit they were wrong so they try to defend it,
    Even though in two thousand seven Bush and Paulson committed it,

    They said giving our tax money saved was a really big need,
    So they fleeced the treasury with unlimited greed,
    It was all a set up and to give money to Wall Street, 
    They knew their time was over and they wanted one last seed,

    So they took our money and the Tea Baggers are acting mad,
    But they blame Obama instead of the people who were bad,
    For eight long years they defended the guy who had,
    Got his election bought and then Supremely legislated by his dad.

    They think they have a right to re-write written history, 
    What they're using for brains is really a mystery,
    Fox News made them think they invented all this yesterday,
    Roger Ailes had this planned for a quarter of a century.

    You can read the real story at:
    (Remember The Truth!)

    Wednesday, October 19, 2011

    Mitch McConnell Is Delusional

    Mitch McConnell is obviously delusional or thinks that we are stupid enough to believe everything he says, even though we have twelve years of evidence to the contrary. After watching the video below and hearing him make this statement on the news, it is obvious that he has only one objective in life, what a sad little man:  

    What kind of politician is satisfied to object to and blame everything on another person without rhyme or reason, just a priority for politics sake that has NOTHING to do with the good of the country, just his own political agenda? That is sick, selfish, self centered, and obvious. He is a lying, conniving, petty little "wanna be" manipulator who isn't even a good liar. Roger Ailes of FAUX NEWS has a Right Wing agenda and makes no excuses for it, the Tea Express was his invention. 
    And how did FAUX NEWS cover the situation? See the videos below:

    And then they tried to act like they were merely covering it instead of instigating the entire movement, complete with signs they brought and handed out: 

    When you are using a major advertiser who owns a major news organization to advertise, agitate, and instigate the movement, it is NOT a grass roots movement, it is a propaganda style invention of obvious transparent agenda based biased advertisers. Even the most conservative guy in Washington, Ron Paul, says it is obvious that FAUX NEWS is biased:

    As John McCain said in his speech:

    The thinking seems to be that somehow if the Republicans in congress cause things to fail during the Obama administration that the voters in this country will blame the president. No one with a brain, a television, and a enough math skills to add two plus two is going to make that mistake. Grant it, the misinformed FAUX NEWS viewers will believe anything some of their favorite pundits tell them to, but the majority of us who aren't blindly following a fake news organization, KNOW the difference. 

    Our country has some MAJOR enemies and I will address them in this list. 

    1) The Koch Brothers: These men have openly declared war on Obama and they are probably the most powerful industrialists in the United States. This is the website that brings the most light to their situation.

    2) As the Koch Brothers article states, Rupert Murdoch is the news magnate that does all the propaganda work for the Koch Brothers and any other right wing antagonists. 

    *Keith Rupert MurdochACKSG (born 11 March 1931) is an Australian Americanbusiness magnate. He is the founder and Chairman and CEO of News Corporation, the world's second-largest media conglomerate.
    In 1953, Murdoch became managing director of News Limited, inherited from his father. He acquired troubled newspapers in Australia and New Zealand during the 1950s and '60s before expanding into the UK in 1969, taking over the News of the World and then the The Sun, which he built into Britain's best selling daily. He moved to New York in 1974 and expanded into the US market, and in 1985 he became a US citizen. In 1981, he bought The Times, his first British broadsheet. In 1986, keen to adopt newer electronic publishing technologies, he consolidated his UK printing operations in Wapping, causing bitter industrial disputes. His News Corporation acquired Twentieth Century Fox (1985), HarperCollins (1989) and The Wall Street Journal (2007). He formed BSkyB in 1990 and during the 1990s expanded into Asian networks and South American television. By 2000 Murdoch's News Corporation owned over 800 companies in more than 50 countries with a net worth of over $5 billion.
    In July 2011 Murdoch faced allegations that his companies including the News of the World, owned by News Corporation, had been regularly hacking the phones of private citizens. He also faces police and government investigations into bribery and corruption in the UK and FBI investigations in the US.[11][12]
    Murdoch has been listed three times in the Time 100 as among the most influential people in the world. He is ranked 13th most powerful person in the world in the 2010 Forbes' The World's Most Powerful People list. With a personal net worth of US$7.6 billion, he was ranked 117th wealthiest person in the world in March 2011.

    3) Rush Limbaugh: * 

    Rush Hudson Limbaugh III (born January 12, 1951) is an American radio talk show host, conservative political commentator, and an opinion leader inAmerican conservatism. He hosts The Rush Limbaugh Show which is aired throughout the U.S. on Premiere Radio Networks and is the highest-rated talk-radio program in the United States. Limbaugh signed an 8-year, $400 million contract extension with Clear Channel in 2008. He was born into a family with a long history of involvement in Republican politics and first began working at a local radio station at age sixteen. In 1984, after a series of radio related jobs, Limbaugh began working as a radio talk show host in Sacramento, California at radio station KFBK, which still airs his syndicated program. His unique program featured no guests, relying exclusively on his conservative political analysis for content. He moved to New York City in 1988 where he began the national broadcast of his program on WABC radio. His program grew in popularity and he began his rise to national fame.

    In the 1990s, Limbaugh’s fame grew beyond radio, into publishing and television. He became a bestselling author with his books The Way Things Ought to Be (1992) and See, I Told You So (1993). From 1992 to 1996, Limbaugh hosted a half-hour television talk show. Limbaugh criticizes liberal policies and politicians and promotes positions viewed as conservative. He frequently accuses the American mainstream media of having a strong liberal bias. A few examples of his commentary: 
    Here Rush was trying to rationalize how he was right to play a song called Barack the Magic Negro on his show. He said it taught him how misinformed the mainstream media is. We can only hope that someday his politically incorrect racism is going to get him fired, but racist listeners will always listen to him because they believe being wrong is correct. Everything he says seems backwards with anyone who grew up in mainstream America with any social skills what so ever.

    With few exceptions, such as Christopher Hitchens, they don't seem to have developed critical thinking. Hitchens is probably one of the most brilliant men in the conservative corner, as he demonstrates with his well thought out, informed opinions. Unfortunately, he is dying from cancer. Although he would never be elected as a Republican, as he is an atheist.

    This brings me to another point that is common among Republicans and most conservatives. I believe that it has somewhat to do with being raised in Christianity. When you are taught as a child that you can just read the rules presented to you by the authorities or in your spirtual books, and you never have to think for yourself, then why would you learn to? The Republican party and the majority of people who consider themselves conservatives have one thing in common. They never developed critical thinking. CRITICAL THINKING:

    disciplined thinking that is clear, rational, open-minded, andinformed by evidence: The questions are intended to develop yourcritical thinking. Unabridged
    Based on the Random House Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2011.
    Cite This Source  :  Link To critical thinking's 21st Century Lexicon

    Main Entry:  critical thinking
    Part of Speech:  n
    Definition:  the mental process of actively and skillfullyconceptualizing, applying, analyzing,synthesizing, and evaluating information toreach an answer or conclusion

    I have one thing to say on this subject. Everyone in the United States has a right to their own opinion, but you can't have your own reality.